<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extreme TNIV texts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/</link>
	<description>Searching for wit and wisdom in a wilderness of words...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:51:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Stitt</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Stitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>I would settle for a hardback with opaque paper David, but I completely agree that TBOTB is refreshing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would settle for a hardback with opaque paper David, but I completely agree that TBOTB is refreshing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gregg</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I absolutely love &quot;The Books of the Bible&quot; edition! I figure, if I want study tools I&#039;ve got a good Bible program for that. Apart from my natural predisposition toward TBOTB and the usual reasons why people like this edition, I&#039;m thinking long-term. Rather than the just-short-of-random book order in the traditional format, The Books of the Bible provides a logical book order. This makes it easy to memorize. Just memorizing this order provides people with some very useful background information about the books they are reading: genre, author, chronological order, subject matter, recipient, etc. The supplemental reading for the book introductions are my favorite that I&#039;ve found in a printed Bible. This Bible is, potentially, a great Bible study tool, especially for people who want to actively pursue a passion for reading the Word (which is also why I love &quot;The Story&quot; edition). I love teaching how to read, study, and understand the Bible, and this is one of the resources I use and strongly suggest to others. I&#039;d love to have a leatherbound edition of The Books of the Bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I absolutely love &#8220;The Books of the Bible&#8221; edition! I figure, if I want study tools I&#8217;ve got a good Bible program for that. Apart from my natural predisposition toward TBOTB and the usual reasons why people like this edition, I&#8217;m thinking long-term. Rather than the just-short-of-random book order in the traditional format, The Books of the Bible provides a logical book order. This makes it easy to memorize. Just memorizing this order provides people with some very useful background information about the books they are reading: genre, author, chronological order, subject matter, recipient, etc. The supplemental reading for the book introductions are my favorite that I&#8217;ve found in a printed Bible. This Bible is, potentially, a great Bible study tool, especially for people who want to actively pursue a passion for reading the Word (which is also why I love &#8220;The Story&#8221; edition). I love teaching how to read, study, and understand the Bible, and this is one of the resources I use and strongly suggest to others. I&#8217;d love to have a leatherbound edition of The Books of the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Zimmerli</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Zimmerli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Esteban,
I hear you about Zondervan&#039;s bonded leather. I have a NIV that seems more like cardboard than leather. But the bonded leather of my new TNIV XL at least &lt;i&gt;seems&lt;/i&gt; to be more durable and comfortable than other Zondervans I&#039;ve used.

I hate red letter too, but what are we gonna do about it? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esteban,<br />
I hear you about Zondervan&#8217;s bonded leather. I have a NIV that seems more like cardboard than leather. But the bonded leather of my new TNIV XL at least <i>seems</i> to be more durable and comfortable than other Zondervans I&#8217;ve used.</p>
<p>I hate red letter too, but what are we gonna do about it? <img src='http://heissufficient.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElShaddai Edwards</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>ElShaddai Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But for me, it will have to wait until it’s available in hardcover: Zondervan’s bonded leather is the bane of my soul.&lt;/i&gt;

It will be interesting to see the binding quality. Zondervan has promised a sewn-binding on the Reference Bible, which hopefully should be more durable than most glued. I agree that a sewn-bound hardback is desirable - my recent purchase of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/04/first-look-nrsv-cross-reference-edition-oxford-isbn-0191000167/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NRSV Cross-Reference from Oxford&lt;/a&gt; is a testament to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But for me, it will have to wait until it’s available in hardcover: Zondervan’s bonded leather is the bane of my soul.</i></p>
<p>It will be interesting to see the binding quality. Zondervan has promised a sewn-binding on the Reference Bible, which hopefully should be more durable than most glued. I agree that a sewn-bound hardback is desirable &#8211; my recent purchase of the <a  href="http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/04/first-look-nrsv-cross-reference-edition-oxford-isbn-0191000167/" rel="nofollow">NRSV Cross-Reference from Oxford</a> is a testament to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voxstefani</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>voxstefani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you did! I&#039;ve enjoyed browsing your blog as well, and have gathered that we do indeed have similar opinions on matters related to Bible translation and publishing.

As for the Foundation edition, that&#039;s my take as well. (Even if mine is in the old NASB, and was printed the year before I was born.) But let me tell you--the TNIV Reference Bible looks pretty close to a suitable replacement! Even with the small and crowded print. But for me, it will have to wait until it&#039;s available in hardcover: Zondervan&#039;s bonded leather is the bane of my soul. Well, that, and red-lettering. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you did! I&#8217;ve enjoyed browsing your blog as well, and have gathered that we do indeed have similar opinions on matters related to Bible translation and publishing.</p>
<p>As for the Foundation edition, that&#8217;s my take as well. (Even if mine is in the old NASB, and was printed the year before I was born.) But let me tell you&#8211;the TNIV Reference Bible looks pretty close to a suitable replacement! Even with the small and crowded print. But for me, it will have to wait until it&#8217;s available in hardcover: Zondervan&#8217;s bonded leather is the bane of my soul. Well, that, and red-lettering. <img src='http://heissufficient.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>&quot;which approach do you naturally gravitate toward?&quot;

TNIV XL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;which approach do you naturally gravitate toward?&#8221;</p>
<p>TNIV XL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElShaddai Edwards</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>ElShaddai Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Gary, thanks for stopping by again. I agree that a good reference Bible is hard to beat, though I still think the TNIV layout is a little over the top. I completely agree that the TBOTB edition would be perfect for devotional reading - I would have thought that a journal-style layout like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnpcb.org/assets/bibles/esv.journaling.sample.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the new ESV Journaling Bible&lt;/a&gt; would be even better.

Esteban, I&#039;ve enjoyed browsing your blog. Count me as a fan of the Foundation NASB Reference Bible as well - until something better comes along, it remains on my desktop. It sounds like we are of a similar mind on such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, thanks for stopping by again. I agree that a good reference Bible is hard to beat, though I still think the TNIV layout is a little over the top. I completely agree that the TBOTB edition would be perfect for devotional reading &#8211; I would have thought that a journal-style layout like <a  href="http://www.gnpcb.org/assets/bibles/esv.journaling.sample.pdf" rel="nofollow">the new ESV Journaling Bible</a> would be even better.</p>
<p>Esteban, I&#8217;ve enjoyed browsing your blog. Count me as a fan of the Foundation NASB Reference Bible as well &#8211; until something better comes along, it remains on my desktop. It sounds like we are of a similar mind on such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voxstefani</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>voxstefani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I just posted a bit about both the TNIV Reference Bible and The Books of the Bible &lt;a href=&quot;http://voxstefani.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-bible-matters.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in my own blog&lt;/a&gt; earlier today. I am not in the least bothered by footnotes of verse numbers, nor indeed by two-column formats, but I must admit to a certain preference to single-column, minimalist page layouts. (This is, I suppose, why I&#039;ve been known to use my Foundation NASB Reference Edition insistently, in spite of cringe-worthy renderings like &quot;how much severer punishment,&quot; etc., at Heb. 10:29.) Anyway, I think I will end up buying both the Reference Bible and TBOTB: the former because I lack an adequate edition of the full TNIV, and the latter because I find it appealing for reading extended passages and whole books in one sitting.

Esteban</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted a bit about both the TNIV Reference Bible and The Books of the Bible <a  href="http://voxstefani.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-bible-matters.html" rel="nofollow">in my own blog</a> earlier today. I am not in the least bothered by footnotes of verse numbers, nor indeed by two-column formats, but I must admit to a certain preference to single-column, minimalist page layouts. (This is, I suppose, why I&#8217;ve been known to use my Foundation NASB Reference Edition insistently, in spite of cringe-worthy renderings like &#8220;how much severer punishment,&#8221; etc., at Heb. 10:29.) Anyway, I think I will end up buying both the Reference Bible and TBOTB: the former because I lack an adequate edition of the full TNIV, and the latter because I find it appealing for reading extended passages and whole books in one sitting.</p>
<p>Esteban</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Zimmerli</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Zimmerli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/extreme-tniv-texts/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Personally, I tend towards a good reference Bible. Generally the references are not so distracting as the notes in a study Bible can be, and I like having them available if I want to check on something.

I do like the normal text Bible, with chapters and verses, mainly because they make it so much easier to navigate through the Bible when discussing with other people. But I would miss the references.

I think the &quot;Books of the Bible&quot; format is a great idea for personal devotional time. It seems to free one&#039;s mind to relax and see the scriptures as they were originally intended to be read. But I&#039;m not so sure it would be a good Bible to use in study, especially when studying with other people. It could be used as a supplement in personal study easily enough.

My vote then, is for the full reference Bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I tend towards a good reference Bible. Generally the references are not so distracting as the notes in a study Bible can be, and I like having them available if I want to check on something.</p>
<p>I do like the normal text Bible, with chapters and verses, mainly because they make it so much easier to navigate through the Bible when discussing with other people. But I would miss the references.</p>
<p>I think the &#8220;Books of the Bible&#8221; format is a great idea for personal devotional time. It seems to free one&#8217;s mind to relax and see the scriptures as they were originally intended to be read. But I&#8217;m not so sure it would be a good Bible to use in study, especially when studying with other people. It could be used as a supplement in personal study easily enough.</p>
<p>My vote then, is for the full reference Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
