<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Oxford Study Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heissufficient.com/2007/12/11/the-oxford-study-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/12/11/the-oxford-study-bible/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-oxford-study-bible</link>
	<description>A personal walk in a wilderness of words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ElShaddai Edwards</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/12/11/the-oxford-study-bible/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>ElShaddai Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/2007/12/11/the-oxford-study-bible/#comment-513</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. Almost everyone who&#039;s read it and isn&#039;t completely biased toward formal translations has positive things to say. However, it occupies the same general market space as the NIV in terms of a median translation, which has a huge evangelical marketing engine behind it. Plus the NRSV came out at the same time and was sold into the American mainline churches. I think it also goes back to a discussion on Iyov&#039;s blog about how Oxford and Cambridge just don&#039;t market themselves outside the academic/scholarly/mainline arenas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. Almost everyone who&#8217;s read it and isn&#8217;t completely biased toward formal translations has positive things to say. However, it occupies the same general market space as the NIV in terms of a median translation, which has a huge evangelical marketing engine behind it. Plus the NRSV came out at the same time and was sold into the American mainline churches. I think it also goes back to a discussion on Iyov&#8217;s blog about how Oxford and Cambridge just don&#8217;t market themselves outside the academic/scholarly/mainline arenas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCR</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2007/12/11/the-oxford-study-bible/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>TCR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/2007/12/11/the-oxford-study-bible/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Elshaddai, this is an excellent review. I noticed one of my former prof as a contributor, Clyde Woods.

How come the REB doesn&#039;t get more recognition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elshaddai, this is an excellent review. I noticed one of my former prof as a contributor, Clyde Woods.</p>
<p>How come the REB doesn&#8217;t get more recognition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

