Comments on: The other side of eschatology http://heissufficient.com/2008/01/11/the-other-side-of-eschatology/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-other-side-of-eschatology A personal walk in a wilderness of words Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:32:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: graham http://heissufficient.com/2008/01/11/the-other-side-of-eschatology/#comment-676 graham Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:36:25 +0000 http://heissufficient.net/2008/01/11/the-other-side-of-eschatology/#comment-676 Thanks for the link! (The only thing I don't like about the article is the use of 'archonology'.) Thanks for the link!

(The only thing I don’t like about the article is the use of ‘archonology’.)

]]> By: Steve http://heissufficient.com/2008/01/11/the-other-side-of-eschatology/#comment-675 Steve Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:36:27 +0000 http://heissufficient.net/2008/01/11/the-other-side-of-eschatology/#comment-675 That's it! That's what I was trying to say in my response to your and Graham's dialogue about Moltmann on my blog. I can definitely handle competing eschatologies that are exegetically different as long as their implications tend towards the future. That's why I've characterized preterism as an "eschatology with a future" because its emphasis is on the "what now" rather than waiting around for something. That’s it! That’s what I was trying to say in my response to your and Graham’s dialogue about Moltmann on my blog. I can definitely handle competing eschatologies that are exegetically different as long as their implications tend towards the future. That’s why I’ve characterized preterism as an “eschatology with a future” because its emphasis is on the “what now” rather than waiting around for something.

]]>