<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing notes on the NLT Study Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/</link>
	<description>worshiping in a wilderness of words</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Harrison</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-3162</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-3162</guid>
		<description>You and I both  -- haven't written as much as I'd like, since the online edition has been sucking up all of my time. I'm hoping to get back to writing now that the online edition is going live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and I both  &#8212; haven&#8217;t written as much as I&#8217;d like, since the online edition has been sucking up all of my time. I&#8217;m hoping to get back to writing now that the online edition is going live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElShaddai Edwards</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-3160</link>
		<dc:creator>ElShaddai Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-3160</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Sean, for the opportunity to look at the NLTSB early on. I haven't gotten as much written as I'd like these past few weeks, but I'm hoping to revisit the different study features a few more times. I'm also looking forward to the online notes when they're available!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Sean, for the opportunity to look at the NLTSB early on. I haven&#8217;t gotten as much written as I&#8217;d like these past few weeks, but I&#8217;m hoping to revisit the different study features a few more times. I&#8217;m also looking forward to the online notes when they&#8217;re available!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Harrison</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-3159</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-3159</guid>
		<description>ElShaddai, I enjoyed reading your review -- thanks for your careful analysis and reflections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ElShaddai, I enjoyed reading your review &#8212; thanks for your careful analysis and reflections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElShaddai Edwards</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-2987</link>
		<dc:creator>ElShaddai Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-2987</guid>
		<description>Ask and ye shall receive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask and ye shall receive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Vázquez</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-2986</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Vázquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-2986</guid>
		<description>ElShaddai, have you seen that Crossway has put online &lt;a href="http://www.esvstudybible.org/images/excerpt-ezekiel-intro.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;a .pdf of Ezekiel 1-3 from the ESV Study Bible&lt;/a&gt;? It might pay to put the notes side-by-side like this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ElShaddai, have you seen that Crossway has put online <a href="http://www.esvstudybible.org/images/excerpt-ezekiel-intro.pdf" rel="nofollow">a .pdf of Ezekiel 1-3 from the ESV Study Bible</a>? It might pay to put the notes side-by-side like this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. Wells</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent review ElShaddai. I just don't think I could get into the NLT no matter how good the study notes were. I tend to agree with Iyov when he states the following:

"I’m quite fond of the Oxford Study Bibles (Catholic NAB, New Oxford Annotated NRSV, New Oxfored Anotated RSV, and Jewish NJPS) as well as the HarperCollins, and I haven’t seen a study Bible yet that I think is better than those."


I prefer the "jottings" style notes over and above the long drawn out commentary in a study Bible. I say keep it concise and relevant without a lot of space consuming chatter that is often not very useful. If I need something beyond this I will break out the commentaries on my bookshelves. As for those who don't have, or can't afford good commentary sets, there are some excellent one volume commentaries out there, such as The Interpreter's One Volume, The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, and releasing next year The New Interpreter's One Volume.

Iyov, I have just ordered the NRSV NOASB 3rd Augmented Edition, published in 2007 I believe. Is this the edition you are referring to? I already use the others you mentioned, with the exception of the Jewish NJPS. Do you have a preference among the Oxford Study Bible's? I also agree concerning the Cambridge, it is the only study Bible I own that I never even bother to take off the shelf anymore.

BTW ElShaddai, I tend to be more of a cat person myself. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent review ElShaddai. I just don&#8217;t think I could get into the NLT no matter how good the study notes were. I tend to agree with Iyov when he states the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m quite fond of the Oxford Study Bibles (Catholic NAB, New Oxford Annotated NRSV, New Oxfored Anotated RSV, and Jewish NJPS) as well as the HarperCollins, and I haven’t seen a study Bible yet that I think is better than those.&#8221;</p>
<p>I prefer the &#8220;jottings&#8221; style notes over and above the long drawn out commentary in a study Bible. I say keep it concise and relevant without a lot of space consuming chatter that is often not very useful. If I need something beyond this I will break out the commentaries on my bookshelves. As for those who don&#8217;t have, or can&#8217;t afford good commentary sets, there are some excellent one volume commentaries out there, such as The Interpreter&#8217;s One Volume, The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, and releasing next year The New Interpreter&#8217;s One Volume.</p>
<p>Iyov, I have just ordered the NRSV NOASB 3rd Augmented Edition, published in 2007 I believe. Is this the edition you are referring to? I already use the others you mentioned, with the exception of the Jewish NJPS. Do you have a preference among the Oxford Study Bible&#8217;s? I also agree concerning the Cambridge, it is the only study Bible I own that I never even bother to take off the shelf anymore.</p>
<p>BTW ElShaddai, I tend to be more of a cat person myself. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>See &lt;a href="http://voiceofiyov.blogspot.com/2008/08/problems-with-notes-in-nlt-study-bible.html?showComment=1218106020000#c8852110167926662947" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;my comments at Iyov's post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://voiceofiyov.blogspot.com/2008/08/problems-with-notes-in-nlt-study-bible.html?showComment=1218106020000#c8852110167926662947" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">my comments at Iyov&#8217;s post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iyov</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>Iyov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>I would also add that there is not a lot of overlap among the Oxford annotated SBs I've seen -- with the exception of the &lt;i&gt;NRSV New Oxford Annotated Bible&lt;/i&gt; and the &lt;i&gt;NJPS Oxford Jewish Study Bible&lt;/i&gt; (which share a common editor and also some essays) they don't have overlap (except for the color maps.)

I just think Oxford has high standards for its academic Study Bibles (not true of Cambridge, unfortunately.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also add that there is not a lot of overlap among the Oxford annotated SBs I&#8217;ve seen &#8212; with the exception of the <i>NRSV New Oxford Annotated Bible</i> and the <i>NJPS Oxford Jewish Study Bible</i> (which share a common editor and also some essays) they don&#8217;t have overlap (except for the color maps.)</p>
<p>I just think Oxford has high standards for its academic Study Bibles (not true of Cambridge, unfortunately.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iyov</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>Iyov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>Actually, the &lt;i&gt;REB Oxford Study Bible&lt;/i&gt; (and the earlier &lt;i&gt;NEB Oxford Study Bible&lt;/i&gt;) are quite good -- first, there was significant coordination with translators, so both of these are close to being "official" annotated editions.  The notes are brief, but as your example points out, they are good and relevant.  The trend in more recent SBs is for longer and more annotations, and these editions remind me of the earlier editions of the &lt;i&gt;New Oxford Annotated&lt;/i&gt; (second edition and earlier).

I also think the REB is the best of the dynamic translations.  The NEB is known for some wild interpretations, and now seems a bit dated, but it is good for stimulating thought.

It is a pity that the REB OSB is now out of print in hardcover.  I think it has a market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the <i>REB Oxford Study Bible</i> (and the earlier <i>NEB Oxford Study Bible</i>) are quite good &#8212; first, there was significant coordination with translators, so both of these are close to being &#8220;official&#8221; annotated editions.  The notes are brief, but as your example points out, they are good and relevant.  The trend in more recent SBs is for longer and more annotations, and these editions remind me of the earlier editions of the <i>New Oxford Annotated</i> (second edition and earlier).</p>
<p>I also think the REB is the best of the dynamic translations.  The NEB is known for some wild interpretations, and now seems a bit dated, but it is good for stimulating thought.</p>
<p>It is a pity that the REB OSB is now out of print in hardcover.  I think it has a market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElShaddai Edwards</title>
		<link>http://heissufficient.com/2008/08/06/comparing-notes-on-the-nlt-study-bible/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>ElShaddai Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heissufficient.net/?p=595#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I’m quite fond of the Oxford Study Bibles [...] as well as the HarperCollins, and I haven’t seen a study Bible yet that I think is better than those.&lt;/em&gt;

Iyov, I've not had a chance to ask you this directly before, but where/how to do you "rank" the REB Oxford Study Bible's approach to the other Oxford editions that you've noted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I’m quite fond of the Oxford Study Bibles [...] as well as the HarperCollins, and I haven’t seen a study Bible yet that I think is better than those.</em></p>
<p>Iyov, I&#8217;ve not had a chance to ask you this directly before, but where/how to do you &#8220;rank&#8221; the REB Oxford Study Bible&#8217;s approach to the other Oxford editions that you&#8217;ve noted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
